Montreal (AFP) – A final report Thursday confirmed that the World Anti-Doping Agency did not show “favouritism” towards China in the case of 23 Chinese swimmers who were cleared to compete after testing positive for a banned drug. But it also found WADA’s anti-doping rules and administrative processes can be further strengthened, which the agency itself acknowledged.
The report’s author, Swiss prosecutor Eric Cottier, said he found “WADA has done its work autonomously, independently and professionally, and that there is no evidence to the contrary.” This matched his interim findings announced in early July, but US Anti Doping Agency chief Travis Tygart, who has been an outspoken critic of WADA’s handling of the affair, said the report “only validates our concerns.”
Related news
Cottier noted also in the final report that some anti-doping rules were not followed by the Chinese anti-doping agency (CHINADA), but added “it does not change the outcome of the cases and the acceptance of the contamination hypothesis.” In April, the New York Times and German broadcaster ARD reported that the swimmers had tested positive for the banned heart medication trimetazidine (TMZ) at a domestic competition in late 2020 and early 2021. It was determined by Chinese anti-doping authorities they ingested the substance unwittingly from tainted food at their hotel and no action against them was warranted.
The World Anti-Doping Agency accepted the argument of the Chinese authorities and did not sanction the swimmers, 11 of whom were selected for the Paris Olympics this past summer. The case caused a global uproar, with US anti-doping authorities accusing WADA of a cover-up. “While WADA management wants to close the book on this scandal regarding 23 positive TMZ cases by Chinese swimmers, the full report released today by WADA’s investigator only validates our concerns and even raises new questions that must be answered,” Tygart said in a statement.
“Clean athletes give their all to excellence and what this report shows is that the global anti-doping regulator did not give them the same in return. Not only was the scope of the investigation restricted to two surface questions, but the information that Mr. Eric Cottier did gather clearly shows that China did not follow the rules, and that WADA management did nothing about it.” Tygart called for a further investigation, “where the scope and the investigator are identified by neutral third parties and a proper results management process to bring finality to these positive tests.” The Cottier report itself speaks to the desperate need for this expanded investigation, noting, ‘The sense of justice or injustice, however, goes far beyond the scope of this investigation,'” Tygart said.
– Strengthen the system – WADA director general Olivier Niggli welcomed the final report. There are “certainly lessons to be learned by WADA and others from this situation,” he said in a statement, while vowing to follow recommendations to strengthen the global anti-doping system for athletes. This includes improving WADA’s internal guidelines for managing doping cases; improving communications about alleged cases with national anti-doping agencies and athletes; and optimizing a database called ADAMS to alert officials when there are delays in analysing tests, for example.
WADA said a working group has been asked to submit recommendations in December. Tygart said USADA was “heartened” by the establishment of the working group which “has the potential to make critical strides in ensuring that the global anti-doping system has the controls and systems in place to evenly apply the rules and protect clean athletes’ rights worldwide.”
In a separate statement Thursday, WADA said it was also placing seven national anti-doping organizations on a “watchlist,” giving them four more months “to correct outstanding non-conformities” to a new anti-doping code. They are Namibia, Pakistan, Panama, Samoa, Senegal, Uganda and Uruguay.
© 2024 AFP
